Monday, January 12, 2015

Je Suis Charlie -- Blues and the Politics of Insanity


Actress Barbara Harris as "Albuquerque" in Robert Altman's Nashville. Image courtesy rogererbert.com 


Je Suis Charlie—Blues and the Politics of Insanity

By Carl L. Hager


This will probably read as a cross between social commentary and musical analysis for most readers, but for quite a few it will also read like a film review of Robert Altman’s 1975 film, Nashville—which it also is. For those who don’t like to predict the end of a film, yet don’t like to be shocked by it, or who are surprised when Muslim radicals kill journalists whose provocations offend them, my instinct is to issue a spoiler alert here. If you don’t mind being utterly confused by what I have to say, feel free to ignore the commentary in the embedded videos, but you would be wise to consider each as an integral part of the essay and watch them. They won’t spoil the impact of what Pauline Kael described at the time as “the funniest epic vision of America ever to reach the screen.” The film was made 40 years ago. If you didn’t see it coming, you’ve got to ask yourself the question Robert Altman poses: why didn’t you listen to the warning?

To say that the radical approach Robert Altman pioneered early in his career was non-linear doesn’t even begin to describe his hyperextended naturalism, the disorienting real-time chaos of overlapping dialog and simultaneous live-action. The camera’s point of view is that of someone crashing a party, not the traditional one of being formally introduced to each, one at a time.  His films are such an acquired taste that I, an ardent fan, have to re-acquire the taste whenever I watch them. But I do, and the two I return to watch most often are M*A*S*H and Nashville.

M*A*S*H is probably the best known of all of his films. Not because that many people have seen it, but because of the subsequent television show that reduced it to Alan Alda doing an endless stream of smirking frat-boy jokes. M*A*S*H, the movie, bore no resemblance to the swaddled primetime gauze-and-bandages reality, but was instead one of the harshest, bloodiest, most unforgiving anti-war films ever made, disguised as a Korean War-era black comedy—and made in 1970, at the height of the Vietnam war. It was anti-war in the same sort of apolitical spirit of conscientious objection as Joseph Heller’s Catch 22. If most sacred cows were tucked into bed by the end of one of the subsequent TV show’s episodes, the original film left the viewer in a hellish cloud of slaughter and burning flesh.

As well it should have. No rational human being loves war. No rational human being loves an indifferent and desensitized bureaucracy so out of touch with the real world that it values its sprawling playbook of rules and speeches and political poses over lives.

Neither does any rational human being deny someone the right to fight back. Dr. Martin Luther King—who spent a lifetime encouraging non-violence in seeking justice and civil rights, warning against the perils of using the eye-for-an-eye retribution of the jungle—applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon in 1956, after his house was bombed.

The discussion gets a bit tricky at this point. But all moral outrage and ideological self-righteousness aside, calling a madman or a terrorist anything but a madman or terrorist doesn’t make it so, even if it makes you sleep better at night.

You might just get away with inducing a deep, deep sleep and plunge into a long winter’s nap. But as the thousands of napping French security forces discovered recently, waking from the coma of denial comes with a nightmare.

Nashville, the Movie Not the TV Show

In his film Nashville, Altman takes on the American Dream (which arguably amounts to an amalgamation and distillation of the Western world’s dreams—where do you think “liberté, égalité, fraternité” comes from?) Perforce, this includes the American Nightmare (and the West’s). Of necessity, it means the film is not only about music and musicians, love and deception, talent and dreams; it’s about lawyers, guns and money. There are so many stories and so many levels of myth and mythology in Nashville, it would be a daunting task to catalog them all. It would also be pointless, because the story line is factually comprised of all the stories. But there’s no denying that the history of the nightmare of the West, whether the discussion is of western Ukraine, western Paris, or the wild, wild West of America, is the history of those myths—plus lawyers, guns and money.

It’s a big story, with dozens of narrative threads. Altman’s approach in Nashville, as with most of his other films, was to tell many separate, single stories, and let them all tell the bigger story. This was much like the approach Miles Davis used in guiding the musicians who played in his various assemblages of personnel (instead of prescribing a key or specific notes, his single piece of advice to a recently-hired Chick Corea just hours prior to the pianist’s first gig—no rehearsal, no sheet music, no nothing—was to “play what you hear”). Altman cast his film with actors who came with stories ready to tell, in need of a place to tell them.


The evolution of this script may or may not have begun with Altman’s hearing Carradine sing the signature tunes at a party, as the actor offers, but there’s no question that his subsequent use of them as the building blocks was an essential aspect of the organic growth that began with Joan Tewkesbury’s diary and early script. Altman’s ingenuity in letting the actor/musicians tell the story of Nashville through the music they performed lay in his faith in the process, just like with Miles’s simple introduction for Chick on his joining the world’s most acclaimed jazz band. Letting the music, or anything else, speak for itself, is almost contrary to what a crafter of movie fiction is all about. Even a documentary film only has a limited range of interpretation. A Hollywood producer’s instinctive urge to make a single, easy-to-understand dramatic conflict swirled together with a standard-issue love interest the central themes, is thwarted by the facts before he even starts. So he just makes up a story line and hires a screenwriter to cobble it all together into a commercially viable film.

It is a fairly common practice nowadays to cast actors who are musicians to play musicians—such films as Beyond the Sea or Ray would not have stood a chance without Kevin Spacey or Jamie Foxx—and it was Altman’s 1975 film that paved the road ahead for them. But actors as songwriters?


It can’t be overstated that it was the process and multifold involvements that Altman engaged in the development of Nashville’s script/story line that made it capable of being much more than a movie about country music. Not only did Altman create the role of a politician for his film, he had writer Thomas Hal Phillips create a mythical one, a politician who spoke to Phillips, one who addressed what he personally would want to hear from a presidential candidate, and thus be a genuine grassroots candidate who could by extension connect with the filmgoer. (As an example, though Altman doesn’t speak of it in this video clip, Phillips includes a plank in the Replacement Party—his fictitious presidential candidate’s—campaign platform that calls for a law disqualifying any lawyer from holding public office, a populist view if ever there was one). With the Grand Ole Opry as a backdrop, and an assortment of musical talents more variegated than the population of the Star Wars cocktail bar, the film gradually builds into an epic metaphor for the egalitarian ideals of the American experience.

The script called for a role, as yet uncast when the filming started, of a celebrated superstar country music singer along the lines of a Loretta Lynn or Dolly Parton. Altman and his team were already on location in Nashville to begin shooting, when he learned that a singer/songwriter he was purchasing song rights from, Ronee Blakely, was in town performing. The master of organic chemistry went to work.


I don’t know precisely what Robert Altman should have said in response to the Washington Post reporter. His film was certainly not responsible for Mark David Chapman murdering John Lennon. What Altman did go on to say about Nashville a generation later, in the commentary reel for Paramount’s DVD release, was: “The statement here is, these people are not assassinated because of their ideas or what they do. They're assassinated to draw attention to the assassin. And in political assassinations, in their sort of warped minds, they know that they are going to have a certain amount of people who said 'that son of a bitch [the politician] should have been shot,' because there's such heat about it. But actually what they are doing is killing somebody who's in the public eye and is some sort of an icon. Because this feeling that by, doing that, committing that assassination they draw the attention to themself, and they make themselves consequently important. Ah, and it's no surprise to me, the Lennon assassination, because this is what all that is, and I don't think we have seen the end of it either."

We All Come to Look for America

And so the story goes. By the time it all came together, Nashville wasn’t really a musical in the classic sense of a stitched-together libretto used to glue a series of musical numbers into a whole. In fact, the reverse is almost the case, especially in scenes liberally improvised by the actor/singers. The film, like a few others of Altman’s, defies category. There were twenty-nine songs included, many of them full performances, and a large percentage of them were written and/or performed by the actors themselves. Many in the Nashville music establishment at the time took umbrage—but that they had missed the point of the movie, that the entire spectrum of humanity represented in Nashville is indeed what Nashville is, what the world is, and that Nashville’s microcosm includes a psychopath with a gun in his guitar case—eventually dawned on most of them. It is an incontrovertible but very uncomfortable truth that 2 or 3 out of a hundred human beings sharing this planet with us are stark, staring mad. How could the Queen of Mean, New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael, have found humor in such a blood-curdling look at America? I guess you’d have to see the film.

Nashville received nine Golden Globe nominations, the most  one film has ever received. It also set the record for the most-ever nominations for a single acting category, when Ronee Blakely, Lily Tomlin, Barbara Harris and Geraldine Chaplin were all nominated for Best Supporting Actress Golden Globes. Roger Ebert wrote that “...after I saw it I felt more alive, I felt I understood more about people, I felt somehow wiser. It’s that good a movie.” It also received five Academy Award nominations (including Ronee Blakely and Lily Tomlin, again, for Best Supporting Actress). But out of all those nominations, the sole winner turned out to be the music. Keith Carradine won the Academy Award for Best Original Song as well as the Golden Globe for Best Original Song – Motion Picture, both for his song “I’m Easy.” 

As it should be. And since you have kept reading this in spite of my earlier spoiler alert, I’ll tell you why. “I’m Easy” was written, sung and acted by an actor who despised the character he was portraying—a heartless, gutless, dishonest, serial womanizer, and killer of souls. The critical scene in which he performs his song takes place in an intimate nightclub setting. Seated at different tables, and utterly oblivious to each other, are four different women he is currently sleeping with. Each listens intently as he warmly seduces them with his voice and guitar, emotionally moved and blissfully unaware that he is, at the same time, cuckolding each of them and wantonly destroying each of their lives.

Psychopaths come in many guises. The most dangerous are the ones we fail to see until we find ourselves swept along in their destructive wake. Politicians. Lawyers. Lovers. Folk singers. Sweet-faced young jihadists. Even U.S. Army veterans (Nashville’s disturbing antagonist wears an olive-drab military jacket similar to the one worn by Travis Bickle, who didn’t appear in Taxi Driver and our cultural consciousness until a year after Nashville was released. Oddly, Army surplus stores could barely keep them in stock after that.)

Art Imitating Life Imitating Art

Due to good luck and nerve, one evening in 1991 I had the opportunity to hear the story of Altman and crew’s masterful interweaving of art and artifice from one of Nashville’s key participants, actress Karen Black. I was having dinner alone at the Lek Café, a tiny Thai restaurant on Fountain Avenue in Hollywood that, while it lasted, was a classic hole-in-the-wall place that served spectacular food at modest prices. I was eating my longstanding favorite, fried garlic shrimp on a bed of lightly pickled cabbage and the only perfectly-prepared brown rice I’ve ever found—when, who should I see but a pair of women seated on the other side of the dining area, one of whom was unmistakably Karen Black.

Who, dear reader, you were just listening to Altman describe as “...the biggest ‘star’ we had in the movie...” (with recent films like Easy Rider, Five Easy Pieces, The Great Gatsby, Portnoy’s Complaint, et al.), and his use of her acting skills in the role of country star Connie White, as “on-the-nose casting.” I’d vacillated a bit about whether I wanted to make a star-struck whistle stop by her table as I exited the place, when she happened to look up from her food and catch me gazing in her direction.

Then she smiled. Just like in the movies. Karen Black’s smile was not the usual look-at-my-dental-work, imagine-me-twenty-years-ago smile. Karen Black smiling was like the sun coming up over the horizon on a clear summer morning. I immediately crossed the room and did just as I’d planned, and thanked her for her tremendous body of work. What I had not planned for is that she would invite me to sit down and join them. I did, of course, without hesitation, and for the next hour or so we talked about—what else?—movies. When we got to her work in Nashville, we talked in greatest detail about the very same experience Altman described earlier in the video (you’re watching them now, aren’t you?) about casting her.

In the world of Robert Altman’s cinematic maelstrom of counterweights and balanced forces, “casting” took on additional meaning and was evolving with the needs of the personalities of the actors, as we witnessed in his casting of actor/singer/songwriter Carradine against type, and against the actor’s own wishes. Or in his starting the filming before an actress had been selected for the pivotal role that was ultimately key to the denouement in the last reel. Then there was the day the heterodox Altman set attracted the happy happenstance of Elliott Gould and Julie Christie coming by for a visit and making two fortuitous cameos, as themselves... in Nashville. But earlier than all of that, in the film’s beginning stages of development, after Altman had used a pair of Carradine’s songs to sell the movie project to ABC but before the song performances had become the structural focus of the film, Karen Black had walked up to him at their initial meeting with three songs she had written. Through a combination of intensive script study, ESP, espionage and perceptive vision, she had decided that she wanted the role and determined how to cut to the chase. She showed up, rehearsed and ready, and sang her three songs to him. By the time she had performed the last of the three for the director, she had the job.

In one final act of life imitating art imitating life before I left the Lek Café, Ms. Black gave me a script she’d stuffed in her purse, and asked me if I’d engage my fleeting interest in screenwriting and look at what might be done to fix whatever it was that was wrong with it. I read it over several times, but never did figure out the script or how to help her with it. But I had learned a lesson from the great actress—that a real artistic genius needs to be a provocateur, not an assassin.

Je suis Charlie? 

Je suis.

But it’s pretty obvious that journalists are still learning the difference between provocation and assassination. Imagine being asked by a reporter whether you feel responsible for John Lennon’s murder. The term describing this craven, unethical approach to investigating a story or idea is the unfortunately apt phrase “loaded question,” for the obvious reason that responding to it in any way at all could be lethal. The representative of the Washington Post who asked Altman the question is one of those 2 to 3 in a hundred human beings who have determined that their daily survival depends on keeping the other 97—everyone else in the world—nice and quiet, under control, cowed, heads down and sweating for fear of thinking a stray thought or disturbing “the peace.”

When those 2 to 3 people in a hundred are in positions of authority, whether in spheres of government or electronic media or army surplus chains or arts & entertainment, they like to maintain their positions by convincing you and me that we need them and can’t live without them. Without the IRS, how would we ever manage to pay for all the (fill in the blank) that the U.S. government provides us? Without an agent taking 20% for directing our affairs, how could we ever survive the plummeting CD/movie ticket/book/magazine/fine art/photography sales? Without VA psychiatrists medicating returned veterans on regimens of Xanax-and-Abilify cocktails like they’re herding cattle, how would the GIs ever get through another day without being depressed by the world they’ve come home to? Without the plethora of 24/7 news coverage promoting ideological prescriptions for correct thinking, how would we ever know how to deal with the tidal wave of bad news they flood into our living rooms? Without the masters of war, who would build the big bombs?

Etc.

The Blues

My brush with stardom and stardust aside, I think that greater even than the casting coup of getting Karen Black for the role of country music queen Connie White, was Altman’s casting of Barbara Harris as Winifred, or “Albuquerque.” Harris was a veteran character actor with great chops, a Hitchcock favorite, but not so well known to 1970s audiences that anyone was prepared for her tour de force in the final act of the film.

Because one of the lessons we have learned by the time the Nashville credits roll, is that if we are ever to get to the point of dealing with those 2 or 3 out of a hundred assassins, politicians, jihadists or cuckolds, we are going to have to lighten up and see the forest for the trees. We are going to have to learn to tell the difference, and discover that 97 of the hundred people we know or meet are our friends. Musically, the time-honored way of dealing with the politicians and jihadists, the bad roads and bad weather, the pain and the sorrow and the tragedies we inevitably face, is to embrace it all enthusiastically and then throw it as hard and as far away as possible. Pick it up like Chief Broom wresting an ECT machine off the floor of an Oregon state hospital, and throw it as far as you can. You put your arms around it and then sling it. In musical terms, you sing it. You sing the blues.    

Technically—if you are addressing a musicologist (!)—there is just one type of music that qualifies as The Blues. Some of the better-known practitioners of the different blues forms have been Billie Holiday, Miles Davis, Aretha Franklin, B.B. King, Howlin’ Wolf, Ray Charles. And more recently, Janis Joplin, Stevie Ray Vaughan, Joe Cocker, Buddy Guy, Eric Clapton.

But that’s the narrow view. If you are not addressing a musicologist, count yourself lucky, because now you can count every symphony in history, every song that’s ever been sung. It’s all blues. It’s ALL blues. Blues plus jazz, too. And bluegrass. Opera. Country. Hip-hop. Folk. Rock‘n’roll. Washtub bass and a comb. It’s all blues. It all serves the purpose.

The more it kicks your ass, the better. The more it makes you cry, the better. Because the more it makes you cry, the more it will make you laugh about it all later.

Barbara Harris was cast for the Shakespearean finale of Nashville for the simple reason that even though there are musicians who can act when they're called upon, and actors who can sing, well... in some cases you need someone who was born to do both. There’s a lot of truth in the saying that you can’t tell a book by its cover.

When the situation calls for some soul-deep blues, you need someone who can sing it.
   


Thursday, January 1, 2015

Happy New Year? Are You Kidding Me?


Photo of Bobby Tiimmons by Francis Wolff


Happy New Year? Are You Kidding Me?
by Carl L. Hager


Happy New Year? That's right. No kidding.

The salutation "Happy New Year!" has hundreds of variations in hundreds of cultures. It's fair to say that every one of the world's 6,500+ languages (minus some of the lesser used ones, like the approximately 2,000 spoken by fewer than a thousand people--I mean, who learns to speak FORTRAN any more?) has an equivalent phrase. Mandarin Chinese, for example, which is the heavyweight champion of planet Earth, is spoken as a first language by roughly 875,000,000 people, and you know what a big deal they make of a new year.

The English phrase "Happy New Year!" is what linguists call an ellipsis, a phrase/clause that omits one or more words that are implied, understood to be present in the context of the other words. So you could say that "Happy New Year!" literally means "(Have A) Happy New Year!" except, well, its meaning is virtual, because... never mind. You know what I mean. Right? Even if Oxford now says "literally" in some cases can mean "virtually", the original meaning of "virtually" can still be used to describe something that is nearly the case, a concept that is generally or broadly true without specifically showing the exceptions. Right? 

Stay with me here. The quiz will come later, in the form of daily life.

Auld Lang Syne

Oddly enough, this little ellipsis expresses a sentiment that appears to be the dead reverse of "Auld Lang Syne," that sentimental, almost morose music that we sing or perform or listen to as we utter "Happy New Year!" Robert Burns's poem, which he apparently constructed from a very old Scots folk song, and the modern song that sprang from it, are the glass-half-full version of the story of last year, a wee bit o' pining for the good old days. Because not everything about 2014 was so bad that we need to utter "good riddance" to all that happened. 2014 held some good times. It's just that it takes a little work to think of what those good times were.

The work is made harder by the fact that memory and recorded history seem to be designed on the basis of disagreements. Yesterday's triumphs get buried under the slag heap of losses and disappointments. You don't remember the times you received an "A" on a school exam, but you certainly remember the times you failed one. You likely don't remember much about your first kiss, but you remember every detail of the breakup with the love of your life. It's the way the memory's algorithm sorts things. When suppressed, these losses and disappointments become resentments. When vocalized, they come out as complaints. So a year-end review of 2014 transforms quickly--from the year that the San Francisco Giants triumphed in the World Series over the proud and daring Kansas City Royals in such a way that everyone on both teams, fans included, went home feeling like winners, to the year of deadlocked special interests and petty machinations in Washington, D.C., culminating in a violently displeased electorate voting to throw the bums out. Instead of being remembered as the year 12 Years A Slave won the Best Picture Oscar, it's remembered as the year when a NYC cop killed 350-lb. asthmatic Eric Garner for resisting arrest while committing the unspeakable crime of selling untaxed cigarettes on those mean streets. Instead of being remembered as the year when the first bionic eye was developed that would allow up to 85% of legally blind people to see, 2014 is remembered as the year Rev. Al Sharpton led protesters through the streets as they chanted "What do we want? Dead cops! When do what them? Now!," the same year we celebrated Christmas with thoughts of the families of two NYC policemen, slain by an avenging madman.

All those numberless insanities clogging our memory banks call for the singing of "Auld Lang Syne." It's meant to remind us that this world still holds a few good things as well as the newly-accumulated crappy ones. The phrase "auld lang syne" comes from the ancient Scots language that translates literally to "old long since," and idiomatically (virtually) to something like "a long time ago" or "long, long ago." So when you see Burns's line "For auld lang syne," you are being encouraged to remember not only San Francisco's Madison Bumgarner, but Kansas City's Wade Davis as well, for their historic performances in the playoffs and World Series. You are singing to remind yourself that if you had been in life-threatening trouble in a burning corner of Ferguson, Missouri, on one of those dark nights last August--and, whether black or white, you didn't start the fire--you would have been very fortunate indeed if a cop had come to your rescue. You are singing to remind yourself that if the same thing had happened to you on the outskirts of Kiev, Putin's boys would have put you in the ground without a grave marker or a grand jury, and certainly without any television coverage.

Bobby Timmons

Bobby Timmons was a brilliant 1950s/60s-era jazz pianist and composer who worked semi-successfully on his own and very successfully as a sideman for a number of jazz's giants, among them Kenny Dorham, Chet Baker, Sonny Stitt, Maynard Ferguson, and most notably, Art Blakey, whose signature smash hit tune, "Moanin'," was composed by none other than his pianist, Bobby Timmons. The Timmons biography, when written by a cynical jazz journalist fascinated by people's darker side, typically ends there, with a bleak epitaph about Timmons's death at 36 from cirrhosis.

But Bobby Timmons was much more than a brilliant burnout whose drug and alcohol addictions robbed him of half a lifetime's worth of a celebrated musician's lush life. Once upon a time he was a little boy with a mother and father (a minister) who were both pianists. He was also an ardent piano student fortunate enough to have a music teacher for an uncle in Robert Habershaw. On graduating from high school, he accepted a scholarship to attend the Philadelphia Music Academy, a school established in 1877 and currently known as the University of the Arts, one of the oldest in the U.S. dedicated to the performing arts.
  
So when Timmons later recorded "Auld Lang Syne," he wasn't contemplating the dreariness of a hardscrabble ghetto existence, battling through the school of hard knocks. He was looking back fondly at the kind of supportive upbringing a musician would wish for, at a time when it could only have happened when it did, and in a musical environment like Philadelphia. When such a person as Timmons played "Auld Lang Syne" and wished someone to have a "Happy New Year!," it wasn't just a silly social convention he was following. He expected the listener to understand that it could be so.

You can hear it in his music.




You can also see it in the smooth, calm visage of a young Timmons that is the subject of Francis Wolff's photograph at the top of this article. Wolff and his good friend Alfred Lion were both German Jews who had emigrated to New York, where they soon founded Blue Note Records in 1939. Both loved freedom and despised Nazis. Most importantly, both loved jazz. Coming to America and the little island on the edge of New York state was no accident for them, just as it was no accident that the little island they chose was the capital city of jazz music, whose birthplace of New Orleans had also given way to new homes for the energizing new music in Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and all points in between. Building Blue Note and creating the most enduring, prestigious jazz record label in the world could only have happened when and where it did.

Little Boy Blue

A close friend of mine has two sons he raised pretty much on his own. One son recently graduated from college after a course of study in psychology and criminology, in preparation for a career in law enforcement. The other, who is a few years older, had a similar interest in the law but chose an entirely different route and is now a practicing attorney, working with an important non-profit group--work that doesn't make him wealthy, but makes him rich in the value he brings to the world by helping the people he does.

I was thinking about both these young men while listening to Bobby Timmons's "Auld Lang Syne" yesterday. Their career paths are ones that were freely chosen. Much as Timmons was in his youth, both were encouraged and helped in every way possible by a parent whose ethical mettle is something I've admired for the 30+ years I've known him, so the careers his sons have chosen have a certain symmetry and logic that bespeaks their upbringing.

But what struck me is how much influence my friend, as a parent, still has on the future of his child, as long as he is raising him at or near home, and how little influence he'll have after he's gone. Parents have been haunted by what they could have said or could have done, and when, forever. What could Bobby Timmons's father or mother have said that might have kept him from killing himself with alcohol and drugs? Anything?

There is one thing, at least, and that is to tell a child he can always come home, that it will always be safe to walk through the front door and seek shelter from the ravages of the world. It worked for Miles Davis, after all, when he locked himself into a room at his parents' home in St. Louis, eventually ridding himself of a heroin habit in a promethean cold-turkey withdrawl. But even given the open door, there are no guarantees.

The question that I kept coming back to was: After watching two policemen gunned down in cold blood as they went about their jobs protecting the lives and futures of the next Bobby Timmons or Frank Wolff or Alfred Lion, plus everyone else in that Gotham that never sleeps, what do you say to your son about his future as a policeman? Not just in New York, but in Phoenix, or Atlanta, or Boston? What do you say when he asks you if what is left of the moral fiber in this country is worth risking your life for? What, indeed, has become of the land of the free and home of the brave, when the people we hire to protect all of us are no longer safe from a handful of us?

I'm glad I don't have to answer a son asking me that question.

But if I did, I might play him Bobby Timmons's "Auld Lang Syne" from his 1964 album, Holiday Soul. If necessary, I'd explain my take on why "For auld lang syne," and "(Have A) Happy New Year!" are two sides of the same coin. 

"For auld lang syne, my dear...," I'd say, "I want you to consider all the beautiful wonders of this life. Consider this way of life that has produced the likes of Bobby Timmons and Blue Note Records, Chuck Yaeger and Neil Armstrong, Emily Dickinson, Rhapsody in Blue, Joni Mitchell and Bob Dylan and Huckleberry Finn and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and Ball Four, baseball, and cheeseburgers, all of which were born of the work of Leonardo and Michelangelo and Galileo and Shakespeare and everything that went before.

"When you're done with that, I want you tell someone you know and love to '(Have A) Happy New Year'," and mean it. Then go for a walk, and find a total stranger to tell the same thing. Not all cops or future cops are racists. But if you ever see one who is, one who is violating another human being simply because he can, because that human being is darker-skinned or weaker or in the way, I want you to promise you'll descend on that cop like the wrath of God."

"Okay," he'd say.

"Not all politicians are racists, either. Or Ministers. Or grieving mothers. Or lonely wierdos. Racists and psychos are a very small percentage of the people in the world. They make a lot of noise, though, and can convince you that they are bigger and scarier and greater in number than they ever are, or were. If you wanted to make your life's work to round them up so that I can go on living my life in safety, I'd always be grateful to you."

"No kidding?," he'd ask.

"No kidding," I'd say.